This Just In: Romney Spent A Crap Load Per Delegate

From The Washington Post:

Republican campaign operatives call it the Gramm-o-meter, the money a candidate spends per delegate won, in honor of Phil Gramm, the former Texas senator who spent $25 million and won just 10 delegates, or $2.5 million per, in 1996.

By Republican strategist Alex Vogel's calculation, Mitt Romney is giving Gramm a run for his money. The former Massachusetts governor has spent $1.16 million per delegate, a rate that would cost him $1.33 billion to win the nomination.

By contrast, Mike Huckabee's campaign has been the height of efficiency. Delegates haven't yet been officially apportioned, but roughly speaking, each $1 million spent by Huckabee has won him 20 delegates.

Just as a point of reference: In 2006, the median annual household income according to the US Census Bureau was estimated to be $48,201.00 (1). So, according to the Post: Willard has spent the combined yearly income of approx 24 American families for each of the delegates that he has won so far. Even if the Post's math is fuzzy, I think we can all agree that Willard has spent an awful lot of cheddar in this losing effort and that this warrants my continuing to make fun of him and his campaign.